J Urol Oncol > Volume 23(1); 2025 > Article
Park, Jang, Heo, Ham, Kim, Nam, Lim, Hong, Nam, Lee, Oh, Jeong, Ku, Noh, Kang, Kang, Ha, Kwon, Kim, Kim, Song, Seo, Song, Sung, and Jeong: Gender and Menopause Impact on Recurrence and Cancer-Specific Mortality in Bladder Cancer After Radical Cystectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Abstract

Purpose

Although bladder cancer occurs three to 4 times more frequently in men than in women, the relative number of deaths compared to incidence is higher in women, suggesting that women have a worse prognosis than men. Emerging evidence indicates that the activity of the sex steroid hormone pathway may play a role in bladder cancer development, with demonstrations that both androgens and estrogens have biological effects on bladder cancer in vitro and in vivo. This study investigates the influence of sex and menopausal status on recurrence and cancer-specific death (CSD) in bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC).

Materials and Methods

This retrospective analysis included 3,913 patients from the Korean Bladder Cancer Study Group Database who underwent RC between 2010 and 2019. Patients were categorized based on gender and menopausal status (≤50 years: premenopausal; >50 years: postmenopausal). Pathological factors, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, recurrence, and CSD rates were analyzed using chi-square and Fisher exact tests.

Results

Among the 3,913 patients, 400 (10.2%) were female. Premenopausal females exhibited significantly lower recurrence rates (28.6%) compared to postmenopausal females (45.7%). CSD rates were similarly reduced in premenopausal females (12.0% vs. 22.2% in postmenopausal females). No significant sex differences in recurrence or CSD were observed among premenopausal patients. Pathological T stage, nodal status, and lymphovascular invasion were significantly associated with recurrence in males, while nodal status alone was significant in females. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was significantly more frequently administered to male patients under the age of 50, while no difference was observed in the administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy among female patients based on menopausal status.

Conclusion

Hormonal changes associated with menopause significantly influence bladder cancer outcomes in women. Premenopausal hormonal environments seem protective, underscoring the need for further research into hormone-driven mechanisms in bladder cancer.

INTRODUCTION

Bladder cancer is a significant global health concern, ranking as the ninth most common malignancy and the thirteenth most common cause of cancer-related deaths [1]. Over recent years, a notable gender disparity has emerged in the incidence and outcomes of bladder cancer. While men exhibit a higher incidence of the disease, women often face poorer prognoses, as reflected in higher mortalityto-incidence ratios [2,3]. This discrepancy suggests that gender-related factors, beyond environmental risk factors such as smoking and occupational exposures, may contribute significantly to disease outcomes [4,5]. Despite environmental factors being well-documented contributors to bladder cancer risk, they do not fully explain the observed differences in prognosis between men and women [6].
Recent research has begun to uncover the involvement of sex steroid hormones, including androgens and estrogens, in the pathogenesis of bladder cancer. These hormones have been shown to have significant effects on cancer development, influencing both tumor progression and response to treatment. Androgens, which are more prevalent in men, and estrogens, which are more abundant in women, can affect the biology of bladder cancer in distinct ways. The influence of these hormones on cancer cells suggests that hormonal differences between genders may contribute to the disparity in bladder cancer outcomes [7,8]. Understanding how these hormones shape tumor behavior is crucial for developing targeted therapeutic strategies that consider the hormonal environment of the patient [9,10].
In addition to biological and hormonal factors, sex differences in the diagnosis and management of bladder cancer also play a critical role in the observed disparities. Women are more likely to present with advanced disease, often due to delays in the evaluation of hematuria, and lower rates of appropriate imaging and urologic referrals compared to men [11-13]. These diagnostic delays result in bladder cancer being diagnosed at a more advanced stage in women, which increases the risk of recurrence and cancer-specific mortality [14]. As a result, the combination of diagnostic challenges, biological differences, and hormonal influences contribute to the worse outcomes observed in women with bladder cancer [15,16].
This study aims to further investigate the sex-specific differences in bladder cancer, with a particular focus on how menopausal status may influence disease progression and patient outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted using the Korean Bladder Cancer Study Group Database, which included patients who underwent radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer at 11 institutions from 2010 to 2019. In June 2024, following the systematic planning of a web-based electronic database by the Bladder Cancer Research Group of the Korean Urological Oncology Society, a dedicated database manager was responsible for collecting and validating the data. Adult patients who underwent RC for bladder cancer during the study period and whose follow-up examination results could be confirmed in the medical records of the hospital where the surgery was performed were included. Patients who underwent surgery for other reasons or whose follow-up examination results could not be confirmed were excluded.
This study was described followed by the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines. Menopausal status was determined based on age, with individuals aged 50 years or younger categorized as premenopausal and those older than 50 years categorized as postmenopausal, as menopause typically occurs around the age of 50. The study aimed to assess the impact of sex and postmenopausal status on the recurrence of bladder cancer and cancer-specific death (CSD) following RC. Several factors were analyzed, including pathological T stage, nodal status, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), carcinoma in situ , variant histologies, surgical margins, and the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).
Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics ver. 27.0 (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA). The chisquare test and Fisher exact test were used to evaluate categorical variables. All statistical tests were 2-tailed, and a pvalue of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The study analyzed a total of 3,913 patients, among whom 400 were female (10.2%). Female patients were further categorized based on menopausal status: premenopausal (≤50 years old) and postmenopausal (>50 years old). Differences in recurrence and CSD rates were evaluated in relation to these groups, alongside comparisons to male patients.
At the median follow-up of 39 months (interquartile range, 14-66), recurrence rates were found to vary significantly among the study groups. Although there were no significant differences in T stage (p=0.239), and nodal status (p=0.942) between pre- and postmenopausal females, premenopausal females demonstrated a recurrence rate of 28.6%, markedly lower than the 45.7% observed in postmenopausal females (Table 1). Similar trends were observed in CSD rates. Premenopausal females had a significantly lower CSD rate of 12.0% compared to 22.2% in postmenopausal females. Male patients under the age of 50 exhibited a CSD rate of 24.9%, which was slightly higher than the 22.8% observed in older males (Table 2).
Among premenopausal patients, no significant sex-based differences were identified in recurrence or CSD rates (Figs, 1 and 2). Pathological factors such as pathological T stage, nodal status, and LVI were significantly associated with recurrence in male patients (p<0.001). However, in females, only nodal status showed a significant correlation with recurrence (p=0.043) (Table 3).
NAC was more frequently administered to male patients under 50 years old (34.2%) compared to older males (22.4%). However, among female patients, no significant differences in NAC administration were observed between pre- and postmenopausal groups (Table 4).

DISCUSSION

Emerging evidence suggests that the activity of the sex steroid hormone pathway may play a role in bladder cancer development [7-10]. Both androgens and estrogens have been shown to exert biological effects on bladder cancer in vitro and in vivo [11-13,17-20]. This study aims to elucidate sex-specific differences in bladder cancer and examine the influence of menopausal status on its prognosis.
Premenopausal females exhibited significantly lower recurrence rates (28.6%) compared to postmenopausal females (45.7%), indicating a potentially protective effect of premenopausal hormonal environments against bladder cancer recurrence. In contrast, male patients showed no clear hormonal distinctions, with recurrence rates remaining consistent across age groups.
Recurrence was significantly associated with pathologic T stage, nodal status, and LVI in males, while in females, only nodal status was significantly associated. These findings suggest possible sex-specific biological mechanisms. Further investigation is needed to understand how these factors interact with hormonal changes. CSD rates were also lower in premenopausal females (12.0%) compared to postmenopausal females (22.2%). Among premenopausal patients, no significant sex-based differences were observed in recurrence or CSD rates, suggesting that hormonal factors may equalize outcomes in younger age groups.
Male patients under 50 were significantly more likely to receive NAC compared to females, although no significant differences in NAC use were observed within female subgroups. This discrepancy may reflect potential sex biases in treatment practices or differences in treatment eligibility based on clinical presentations [14,15]. Despite the lack of differences in the frequency of NAC administration, premenopausal female patients exhibited lower recurrence and CSD rates compared to their postmenopausal counterparts, reinforcing the protective role of hormonal environments in this subgroup. Conversely, male patients under 50, despite more frequent administration of NAC than older males, showed no significant differences in recurrence or CSD. This suggests that the effectiveness of NAC may vary depending on gender and menopausal status.
The results of this study underscore the complex interplay between sex, hormonal status, and bladder cancer outcomes. Premenopausal females demonstrated significantly better outcomes compared to postmenopausal females, with lower rates of recurrence and CSD, supporting the protective role of premenopausal hormonal environments. Both estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor have been suggested to be involved in bladder cancer tumorigenesis and progression. The significant association between nodal status and recurrence in females warrants further investigation into its underlying mechanisms.
This study is limited by its retrospective design and potential selection bias. Since it was not possible to confirm menopausal status in female patients, the age of 50 was used as a proxy for menopause. Additionally, the small number of female patients limited the ability to achieve statistical significance. Future research should focus on prospective studies and molecular analyses to further elucidate the role of hormonal influences in bladder cancer progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Hormonal changes associated with menopause significantly influence bladder cancer outcomes, with premenopausal women exhibiting reduced recurrence and CSD rates. These findings underscore the importance of integrating hormonal and sex-based considerations into future research and clinical practices for bladder cancer management.

NOTES

Grant/Fund Support

This study was supported by Korean Bladder Cancer Study Group Database.

Research Ethics

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Samsung Medical Center (IRB No. SMC 2024-11- 036-001). All procedures were conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. Data confidentiality was maintained in compliance with the Data Protection Act 2016/679 (Spanish Government). Due to the retrospective nature of the study, written informed consent was waived.

Conflicts of Interest

JJO, a member of the Editorial Board of Journal of Urologic Oncology, is the coauthor of this article. However, he played no role whatsoever in the editorial evaluation of this article or the decision to publish it. The other authors have nothing to disclose.

Author Contribution

Conceptualization: JSP; Data curation: JSP; Formal analysis: JSP; Funding acquisition: WSJ, JH, KHK, JKN, BJL, BSH, WN, SL, JJO, SHJ, JHK, TIN, SGK, SHK, YSH, TGK, THK, JK, GS, HKS, WS, HHS; Methodology: JSP; Project administration: BCJ; Visualization: JSP; Writing - original draft: WSH; Writing - review & editing: JSP, WSH

Fig. 1.
Bar graphs showing the differences of recurrence cases at age under 50 according to sex (p=0.33).
juo-255000140007f1.jpg
Fig. 2.
Bar graphs showing the differences of cancer-specific death (CSD) cases at age under 50 according to sex (p=0.24).
juo-255000140007f2.jpg
Table 1.
Study population with or without recurrence after radical cystectomy according to sex and menopausal status
Variable No recurrence Recurrence p-value*
Male sex 0.757
 <50 112 (59.9) 75 (40.1)
 50≤ 1,954 (58.7) 1,372 (41.3)
Female sex 0.079
 <50 20 (71.4) 8 (28.6)
 50≤ 202 (54.3) 170 (45.7)

Values are presented as number (%).

* Chi-square and Fisher exact test.

Table 2.
Study population with or without cancer-specific death after radical cystectomy according to gender and menopausal status
Variable No cancer-specific death Cancer-specific death p-value*
Male sex 0.527
 <50 130 (75.1) 54 (24.9)
 50≤ 2,319 (77.2) 684 (22.8)
Female sex 0.231
 <50 22 (88.0) 3 (12.0)
 50≤ 238 (77.8) 68 (22.2)

Values are presented as number (%).

* Chi-square and Fisher exact test.

Table 3.
Comparison of male and female patients age under 50 with or without recurrence after radical cystectomy
Variable Male age <50
p-value* Female age <50
p-value*
Recurrence No recurrence Recurrence No recurrence
Pathology type 0.321 <0.001
 UC 56/63 (88.9) 66/81 (81.5) 6/6 (100) 14/18 (77.8)
 Adenoca 7/63 (11.1) 15/81 (18.5) 0/6 (0) 4/18 (22.2)
T stage <0.001 0.458
 T0,Tx 8/74 (10.8) 21/111 (18.9) 1/7 (0) 5/20 (25.0)
 Ta 0/74 (0) 2/111 (1.8) 1/7 (14.3) 0/20 (0)
 Tis 1/74 (1.4) 6/111 (5.4) 0/7 (0) 2/20 (10.0)
 T1 5/74 (6.8) 25/111 (22.5) 2/7 (28.6) 2/20 (10.0)
 T2 16/74 (21.6) 24/111 (21.6) 0/7 (0) 3/20 (15.0)
 T3 30/74 (40.5) 27/111 (24.3) 3/7 (42.8) 5/20 (25.0)
 T4 14/74 (18.9) 6/111 (5.4) 1/7 (14.3) 3/20 (15.0)
N stage <0.001 0.043
 Nx 4/74 (5.4) 5/111 (4.5) 2/7 (28.6) 1/20 (5.0)
 N0 32/74 (43.2) 83/111 (74.8) 2/7 (28.6) 17/20 (85.0)
 N1 8/74 (10.8) 10/111 (9.0) 2/7 (28.6) 1/20 (5.0)
 N2 22/74 (29.7) 13/111 (11.7) 1/7 (14.3) 1/20 (5.0)
 N3 8/74 (10.8) 0/111 (0) 0/7 (0) 0/20 (0)
Grade 0.766 0.897
 Low 4/60 (6.7) 6/88 (6.8) 1/6 (16.7) 2/14 (14.3)
 High 56/60 (93.3) 82/88 (93.2) 5/6 (83.3) 12/14 (85.7)
CIS 14/72 (19.4) 25/110 (22.7) 0.712 1/7 (14.3) 5/20 (25.0) 1.000
Variant histologies 16/70 (22.9) 22/104 (21.2) 0.130 1/7 (14.3) 2/19 (10.5) 1.000
LVI 42/74 (56.8) 41/110 (37.3) 0.011 3/7 (42.9) 5/19 (26.3) 0.635
Surgical margin 9/74 (12.2) 4/109 (3.7) 0.039 0/6 (0) 0/19 (0) -

Values are presented as number (%).

UC, urothelial carcinoma; Adenoca, adenocarcinoma; CIS, carcinoma in situ ; LVI, lymphovascular invasion.

* Chi-square and Fisher exact test.

Table 4.
Study population with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to gender and menopausal status
Variable No neoadjuvant chemotherapy Neoadjuvant chemotherapy p-value*
Male sex <0.001
 <50 125 (65.8) 65 (34.2)
 50≤ 2615 (77.6) 755 (22.4)
Female sex 0.626
 <50 21 (75.0) 7 (25.0)
 50≤ 303 (78.9) 81 (21.1)

Values are presented as number (%).

* Chi-square and Fisher exact test.

REFERENCES

1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, et al. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11. Lyon (France): International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2013.
2. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 2015;65:5-29.
crossref pmid
3. Fajkovic H, Halpern JA, Cha EK, Bahadori A, Chromecki TF, Karakiewicz PI, et al. Impact of gender on bladder cancer incidence, staging, and prognosis. World J Urol 2011;29:457-63.
crossref pmid pdf
4. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Murray T, et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin 2008;58:71-96.
crossref pmid
5. Scosyrev E, Noyes K, Feng C, Messing E. Sex and racial differences in bladder cancer presentation and mortality in the US. Cancer 2009;115:68-74.
crossref pmid
6. Palou J, Sylvester RJ, Faba OR, Parada R, Peña JA, Algaba F, et al. Female gender and carcinoma in situ in the prostatic urethra are prognostic factors for recurrence, progression, and disease-specific mortality in T1G3 bladder cancer patients treated with bacillus Calmette-Guerin. Eur Urol 2012;62:118-25.
pmid
7. Kluth LA, Rieken M, Xylinas E, Kent M, Rink M, Roupret M, et al. Gender-specific differences in clinicopathologic outcomes following radical cystectomy: an international multiinstitutional study of more than 8000 patients. Eur Urol 2014;66:913-9.
crossref pmid
8. Horstmann M, Witthuhn R, Falk M, Stenzl A. Gender-specific differences in bladder cancer: a retrospective analysis. Gend Med 2008;5:385-94.
crossref pmid
9. Mungan NA, Kiemeney LA, van Dijck JA, van der Poel HG, Witjes JA. Gender differences in stage distribution of bladder cancer. Urology 2000;55:368-71.
crossref pmid
10. Dobruch J, Daneshmand S, Fish M, Lotan Y, Noon AP, Resnick MJ, at al. Gender and bladder cancer: a collaborative review of etiology, biology, and outcomes. Eur Urol 2016;69:300-10.
crossref pmid
11. Soave A, Dahlem R, Hansen J, Weisbach L, Minner S, Engel O, et al. Gender-specific outcomes of bladder cancer patients: a stage-specific analysis in a contemporary, homogenous radical cystectomy cohort. Eur J Surg Oncol 2015;41:368-77.
crossref pmid
12. Mitra AP, Skinner EC, Schuckman AK, Quinn DI, Dorff TB, Daneshmand S. Effect of gender on outcomes following radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: a critical analysis of 1,994 patients. Urol Oncol 2014;32:52.e1-9.
crossref pmid
13. Mallin K, David KA, Carroll PR, Milowsky MI, Nanus DM. Transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: racial and gender disparities in survival (1993 to 2002), stage and grade (1993 to 2007). J Urol 2011;185:1631-6.
crossref pmid
14. Cohn JA, Vekhter B, Lyttle C, Steinberg GD, Large MC. Sex disparities in diagnosis of bladder cancer after initial presentation with hematuria: a nationwide claims-based investigation. Cancer 2014;120:555-61.
crossref pmid pmc
15. Johnson EK, Daignault S, Zhang Y, Lee CT. Patterns of hematuria referral to urologists: does a gender disparity exist? Urology 2008;72:498-502.
crossref pmid
16. Buteau A, Seideman CA, Svatek RS, Youssef RP, Chakrabarti G, Reed G, et al. What is evaluation of hematuria by primary care physicians? Use of electronic medical records to assess practice patterns with intermediate follow-up. Urol Oncol 2014;32:128-34.
crossref pmid
17. McGrath M, Michaud DS, De Vivo I. Hormonal and reproductive factors and the risk of bladder cancer in women. Am J Epidemiol 2006;163:236-44.
crossref pmid
18. Cantwell MM, Lacey JV Jr, Schairer C, Schatzkin A, Michaud DS. Reproductive factors, exogenous hormone use and bladder cancer risk in a prospective study. Int J Cancer 2006;119:2398-401.
crossref pmid
19. Boorjian S, Ugras S, Mongan NP, Gudas LJ, You X, Tickoo SK, et al. Androgen receptor expression is inversely correlated with pathologic tumor stage in bladder cancer. Urology 2004;64:383-8.
crossref pmid
20. Tuygun C, Kankaya D, Imamoglu A, Sertcelik A, Zengin K, Oktay M, et al. Sex-specific hormone receptors in urothelial carcinomas of the human urinary bladder: a comparative analysis of clinicopathological features and survival outcomes according to receptor expression. Urol Oncol 2011;29:43-51.
crossref pmid
TOOLS
METRICS Graph View
  • 1 Crossref
  •  0 Scopus
  • 186 View
  • 5 Download
ORCID iDs

Jee Soo Park
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9976-6599

Won Sik Jang
https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5720-959X

Jieun Heo
https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2767-0364

Won Sik Ham
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2246-8838

Kyung Hwan Kim
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7162-6527

Jong Kil Nam
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3424-2417

Bum-Jin Lim
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1746-6072

Bum Sik Hong
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1991-1229

Wook Nam
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1424-9339

Sangchul Lee
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0844-6843

Jong Jin Oh
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0448-5992

Seung Hwan Jeong
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2182-8523

Ja Hyeon Ku
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0391-2342

Tae Il Noh
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5278-7672

Sung Gu Kang
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1112-7077

Seok Ho Kang
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1524-5233

Yun-Sok Ha
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3732-9814

Tae Gyun Kwon
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4390-0952

Tae‑Hwan Kim
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4924-4826

Jongchan Kim
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0022-6689

Geehyun Song
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7486-4520

Ho Kyung Seo
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2601-1093

Wan Song
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0971-1805

Hyun Hwan Sung
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9845-3742

Byong Chang Jeong
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5399-2184

Related articles

The Clinical Impact of Depression and Anxiety on Complications After Prostate Cancer Treatment: A Retrospective Cohort Study2025 March;23(1)

High-Grade Late Urinary Toxicity Following Salvage Radiotherapy After Radical Prostatectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study2024 March;22(1)

Node-Positive Bladder Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Radical Cystectomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study2020 December;18(3)



Editorial Office
Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine,
101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Korea
TEL: +82-2-2072-0817,   FAX: +82-2-742-4665   Email: journal@e-juo.org
Korean Urological Oncology Society
50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea
Tel: +82-2-704-8574, E-mail: leeseh@yuhs.ac

Copyright © The Korean Urological Oncology Society.

Developed in M2PI