J Urol Oncol > Volume 18(3); 2020 > Article
Lee, Song, Kim, Lee, Hong, Byun, Lee, and Oh: Effect of Body Mass Index and Hypertension on the Prognosis of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma After Radical Nephroureterectomy

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the impact of preoperative underlying hypertension (HTN) and body mass index (BMI) on oncologic outcomes in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) who underwent radical nephroureterectomy (RNUx).

Materials and Methods

From May 2003 to December 2018, 453 UTUC patients who underwent RNUx at a single institution were enrolled in the study. All patients were divided into 2 groups according to preoperative HTN and BMI (cutoff 24 kg/m2) and perioperative parameters and recurrence outcomes were compared. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis was performed to identify the significance of HTN and BMI regarding UTUC recurrence.

Results

Among a total 453 UTUC patients, 233 (51.4%) had HTN, and 222 (49.0%) had BMI ≥24 kg/m2. The HTN versus no-HTN group had similar perioperative outcomes, except for the rate of diabetes (p<0.001). The high-BMI versus low-BMI group had similar outcomes, except for the prevalence of HTN (p=0.026). During median follow-up of 23 months, 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 76.2% in the HTN group and 79.9% in the non-HTN group (p=0.002), and 77.3% in the low-BMI group and 79.0% in the high-BMI group (p=0.007). Multivariate analysis showed that BMI (hazard ratio [HR], 0.740; p=0.046), and HTN (HR, 1.687; p=0.005) were significant predictors of cancer recurrence.

Conclusions

Among UTUC patients who underwent RNUx, patients with HTN and low-BMI showed worse prognosis regarding cancer recurrence. To validate our results, the mechanisms of association between HTN, BMI, and UTUC should be investigated in further prospective studies.

Introduction

In a recent survey, the prevalence of urinary tract ur-othelial carcinoma (UTUC) was 1-2 per 100,000 in the United States, and 4.8 per 100,000 in the Republic of Korea.1,2 UTUC is a highly aggressive malignancy, and rad-ical nephroureterectomy (RNUx) is the current standard treatment for patients with the disease.3 The 5-year re-currence-free survival (RFS) estimate was 70% in patients with UTUC treated with radical RNUx.4
Tumor stage, lymph node metastasis, chronic urinary tract infection, hydronephrosis, and smoking are closely related to recurrence of UTUC.5-9 Hypertension (HTN) and obesity, which are metabolic factors, have been studied regarding cancer. Many studies have reported regarding a relationship between HTN and body mass index (BMI) and renal cell carcinoma, bladder cancer, prostate cancer, breast cancer, and lung cancer.10-17 However, there are few studies about the relationship between HTN, BMI, and UTUC in patients with RNUx. One study reported that patients with low-BMI (<18.5 kg/m2) had a worse prognosis, regarding RFS and cancer-specific survival (CSS), than patients with normal BMI (18.5-25 kg/m2) or obesity (BMI ≥25 kg/m2).18 Another study reported that diabetes mellitus was related to post-operative bladder cancer recurrence in China.19 Therefore, we investigated the influence of HTN and BMI on onco-logic outcomes in patients with UTUC treated with RNUx.

Materials and Methods

1. Study Population

From May 2003 to December 2018, after obtaining institutional review board approval (B-1907-552-110), UTUC patients who underwent RNUx at one institution were enrolled in the study. We excluded patients with metastasis at the time of RNUx, and patients with incomplete data. Thus, 453 UTUC patients were enrolled.

2. Data Collection and Pathologic Evaluation

Baseline data before RNUx were collected, including pre-operative glomerular filtration rate, tumor location and later-ality, and the presence of hydronephrosis, HTN, or concurrent bladder tumor at RNUx. The patient who has HTN defined to who were taking HTN medication regardless of the type of medication before surgery. All surgical speci-mens after RNUx were processed according to standard pathologic procedures. Tumors were staged according to the 2009 American Joint Committee on Cancer and International Union for Cancer Control tumor-node-metastasis cancer staging system.20 All patients had pathologically confirmed transitional cell carcinoma in the upper urinary tract after RNUx.
RNUx was performed using an open, laparoscopic, or robotic method. Open RNUx was carried out in 164 patients (36.2%), laparoscopic RNUx in 143 (31.6%), and ro-botic-assisted RNUx in 146 (32.2%). Most open surgery was done by flank incision for nephrectomy, followed by a Gibson incision for distal ureteral resection. Lymph node dissection was performed when enlarged lymph nodes were found on preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans or were palpable during surgery. No patients had known meta-static disease at the time of surgery, as shown by radiog-raphy and CT scan.
Patients were generally followed-up every 3 months during the first 2 years after surgery, every 6 months from 2-5 years after surgery, and annually thereafter. Follow-up ex-aminations consisted of history taking, physical examination, routine blood evaluation, urinary cytology, cystoscopic evaluation of the bladder, and radiographic evaluation of the chest and abdomen.

3. Statistical Analyses

Statistical analyses were carried out using IBM SPSS Statistics ver. 22.0 (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA). Differences in continuous variables were analyzed by paired t-test. The chi-square test was carried out to assess differences in co-variate distribution among the 2 categories. The primary endpoints were RFS, which was defined as the interval between surgery and the subsequent appearance of either local failure (in regional lymph nodes) at the operative site or in the bladder, and distant metastasis. Survival analysis was carried out using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate survival analyses were carried out using the Cox regression model.

Results

Among a total of 453 patients, 233 (51.4%) had a history of HTN (Table 1). There were no significant differences between the HTN and no-HTN groups, except for the rate of diabetes mellitus (27.5% vs. 10.0%, p<0.001).
Table 1.
Baseline and perioperative results among 453 patients who underwent radical nephroureterctomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma
Variable HTN (−) (N=220) HTN (+) (N=233) p-value BMI<24 kg/m2 (N=231) BMI≥24 kg/m2 (N=222) p-value
Age (yr) 65.28 (59-73) 70.42 (64-77) 0.152 68.79 (63-77) 67.03 (61-74) 0.345
Sex     0.174     0.138
 Male 162 (73.6) 158 (67.8)   156 (67.5) 164 (73.9)  
 Female 58 (26.4) 75 (32.2)   75 (32.5) 58 (26.1)  
Smoking     0.240     0.757
 Yes 38 (17.3) 31 (13.3)   34 (14.7) 35 (15.8)  
 No 182 (82.7) 202 (86.7)   197 (85.3) 187 (84.2)  
ECOG     0.479     0.552
 0 8 (3.6) 14 (6.0)   9 (3.9) 13 (5.9)  
 1 208 (94.5) 214 (91.8)   217 (93.9) 205 (92.3)  
 3-5 4 (1.8) 5 (2.2)   5 (2.2) 4 (1.8)  
Preoperative GFR 73.7 (59.1-86.8) 63.1 (49.4-74.0) 0.495 68.1 (51-82) 68.3 (54-80) 0.776
Laterality     0.054     0.261
 Left 109 (49.5) 138 (58.4)   129 (55.8) 116 (52.3)  
 Right 111 (50.5) 95 (40.8)   100 (43.3) 106 (47.7)  
 Bilateral 0 (0) 2 (0.9)   2 (0.9) 0 (0)  
Location     0.764     0.268
 Lower ureter 44 (22.0) 44 (18.9)   41 (17.7) 47 (21.2)  
 Mid ureter 18 (8.2) 34 (14.6)   21 (9.1) 31 (14.0)  
 Upper ureter 26 (11.8) 35 (15.0)   33 (14.3) 28 (12.6)  
 Pelvis 94 (42.7) 67 (28.8)   83 (35.9) 78 (35.1)  
 Multiple 38 (17.3) 53 (22.7)   53 (22.9) 38 (17.1)  
Hydronephrosis     0.054     0.546
 Yes 138 (62.7) 166 (71.2)   152 (65.8) 152 (68.5)  
 No 82 (37.3) 67 (28.8)   79 (34.2) 70 (31.5)  
Diabetes mellitus     <0.001     0.161
 Yes 22 (10.0) 64 (27.5)   38 (16.5) 48 (21.6)  
 No 198 (90.0) 169 (72.5)   193 (83.5) 174 (78.4)  
HTN           0.026
 Yes       107 (46.3) 126 (56.8)  
 No       124 (53.7) 96 (43.2)  
Operation method     0.707     0.288
 Open 78 (35.5) 86 (36.9)   91 (39.4) 73 (32.9)  
 Laparoscopic 67 (30.5) 76 (32.6)   72 (31.2) 71 (32.0)  
 Robotic 75 (34.1) 71 (30.5)   68 (29.4) 78 (35.1)  
Mean operation time 225 (185-270) 226.45 (175-267.5) 0.651 224.1 (175-265) 232.0 (180-275) 0.520
Estimated blood loss 267 (100-300) 261.93 (100-300) 0.249 277.0 (100-300) 251.7 (100-300) 0.067
Transfusion rate (%) 20.5 18.5 0.591 24.7 14.0 0.046
Complications 7 (3.2) 9 (3.9) 0.695 7 (3.0) 9 (4.1) 0.555

Values are presented as median (interquartile range) or number (%) unless otherwise indicated.

HTN: hypertension, BMI: body mass index, ECOG: Eastern Copperative Oncology group, GFR: glomerular filtration rate.

Median BMI was 24.06 kg/m2 (interquartile range, 21.78-26.08 kg/m2) in the 453 patients, among whom 222 (49.0%) had high-BMI (≥24 kg/m2). High-BMI patients had a high-er rate of HTN than the low-BMI group (56.8% vs. 46.3%, p=0.026) and a lower rate of transfusions (14.0% vs, 24.7%, p=0.046). Other perioperative parameters, including surgical methods, operation time, were similar between the 2 groups.
Clinical and pathologic profiles for the 453 patients were stratified by HTN, and BMI (Table 1). In HTN versus no-HTN patients, significant differences were evident in tu-mor location (p=0.012), tumor laterality (p=0.054), and the presence of preoperative diabetes mellitus (p<0.001), and hydronephrosis (p=0.054). In low-BMI versus high-BMI patients, a significant difference was evident in the presence of preoperative HTN (p=0.026).
Table 2.
Pathologic and survival outcomesin patient who underwent radical nephroureterctomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma
Variable HTN (−) (N=220) HTN (+) (N=233) p-value BMI<24 kg/m2 (N=231) BMI≥24 kg/m2 (N=222) p-value
T stage     0.162     0.053
 Ta 4 (1.8) 2 (0.9)   3 (1.3) 3 (1.4)  
 T1 64 (29.1) 63 (27.0)   55 (23.8) 72 (32.4)  
 T2 72 (32.7) 75 (32.2)   70 (30.3) 77 (34.7)  
 T3 63 (28.6) 82 (35.2)   88 (38.1) 57 (25.7)  
 T4 12 (5.5) 11 (4.7)   11 (4.8) 12 (5.4)  
 Tis 5 (2.3) 0 (0)   4 (1.7) 1 (0.5)  
Lymph node invasion     0.466     0.525
 Nx 125 (56.8) 138 (59.2)   137 (59.3) 126 (56.8)  
 N0 41 (18.7) 55 (23.6)   47 (20.3) 49 (22.1)  
 ≥N1 21 (9.5) 24 (10.3)   21 (9.1) 24 (10.8)  
Grade     0.059     0.553
 I 2 (0.9) 0 (0)   0 (0) 2 (0.9)  
 II 113 (51.4) 112 (48.1)   115 (50.2) 110 (49.5)  
 III 101 (45.9) 121 (51.9)   114 (49.8) 108 (48.6)  
Positive surgical margin (%) 15 (6.8) 15 (6.4) 0.871 21 (9.1) 9 (4.1) 0.031
Recurrence (%) 122 (55.5) 152 (65.2) 0.033 149 (64.5) 125 (56.3) 0.074
Recurrence site            
 Bladder 69 84   79 74  
 Lymph node 52 67   64 55  
 Lung 33 35   37 31  
 Bone 16 28   27 17  
 Liver 16 18   18 16  
 Local 8 15   11 12  
 Others* 34 48   46 36  
Cancer specific survival (%) 207 (94.1) 214 (91.8) 0.802 212 (91.8) 209 (94.1) 0.300
Overall survival (%) 199 (90.5) 208 (89.3) 0.661 200 (86.6) 207 (93.2) 0.143
Adjuvant chemotherapy (%) 66 (30.0) 69 (29.6) 0.880 67 (29.0) 68 (30.6) 0.683

Values are presented number (%).

HTN: hypertension, BMI: body mass index.

* Others: prostate, pelvic cavity, colorectal, adrenal, brain, etc.

Table 2 shows pathologic outcomes according to each group. Overall, 168 patients had pathologic pT3-4 (37.1%). Pathologic stage, grade, and lymph node invasion were similar between the groups. The positive surgical margin was greater in the low-BMI than high-BMI group (9.1% vs. 4.1%, p=0.031). During 42.0-month follow-up, cancer re-currence was observed in 274 patients (60.5%). The most frequent sites of recurrence were the bladder (153 of 453 patients, 33.8%), lymph nodes (119 of 453, 26.3%), lung (68 of 453, 15.0%), and bone (44 of 453, 9.7%). Adjuvant chemotherapy rate was no significantly difference between HTN and no-HTN patients (29.6% vs. 30.0%, p=0.880), al-so no significantly difference between low-BMI and high- BMI group (29.0% vs. 30.6%, p=0.683). Cancer recurrence was more frequent in the HTN than no-HTN group (65.2% vs. 55.5%, p=0.033). Five-year RFS rates were 76.2% in the HTN group and 79.9% in the no-HTN group (log-rank, p=0.002) (Fig. 1), and those were 77.3% in the low-BMI group and 79.0% in the high-BMI group (log-rank, p=0.007) (Fig. 2). Five-year intravesical RFS rates were no significant difference in the HTN group and in the no-HTN group (66.4% vs. 65.7%, log-rank p=0.120), also no difference in low-BMI group and in the high-BMI group (67.4% vs. 64.7% log-rank p=0.438).
Fig. 1.
Kaplan-Meier analysis of the association of hypertension (HTN) with recurrence-free survival in 453 patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with radical nephroure-terectomy.
kjuo-18-3-201f1.jpg
Fig. 2.
Kaplan-Meier analysis of the association of body mass index (BMI) with recurrence-free survival in 453 patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated radical nephrourete-rectomy.
kjuo-18-3-201f2.jpg
Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis showed the significance of BMI and HTN in relation to cancer recurrence after adjusting for other factors (Table 3). That is, BMI (hazard ratio [HR], 0.740; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.551-0.995; p=0.046) and HTN (HR, 1.687; 95% CI, 1.174-2.426; p=0.005) were significant predictors of cancer recurrence. That is, BMI (hazard ratio [HR], 0.740; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.551-0.995; p=0.046) and HTN (HR, 1.687; 95% CI, 1.174-2.426; p=0.005) were sig-nificant predictors of cancer recurrence.
Table 3.
Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis predict significant factors to cancer progression after radical nephroureterctomy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients
Variable Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
HR 95% CI p-value HR 95% CI p-value
Age 1.011 0.999-1.023 0.076 - - -
BMI (<24 vs. ≥24 kg/m2) 0.724 0.569-0.921 0.007 0.754 0.589-0.964 0.024
History of smoking 0.956 0.685-1.333 0.789 - - -
Adjuvant Chemotherapy 3.389 2.658-4.321 <0.005 2.986 2.250-3.962 <0.005
Tumor stage (≥T3 or not) 2.142 1.683-2.726 <0.005 1.085 0.814-1.446 0.579
Tumor grade (≥3 or not) 1.156 0.909-1.469 0.236 - - -
Lymph node invasion 1.377 1.083-1.751 0.009 1.236 0.964-1.585 0.095
Positive surgical margin 2.789 1.890-4.114 <0.005 2.355 1.580-3.510 <0.005
Postoperative GFR 0.997 0.991-1.003 0.411 - - -
Presence of preoperative Hydronephrosis 1.444 1.101-1.892 0.008 1.174 0.889-1.551 0.258
Presence of preoperative DM 1.130 0.836-1.527 0.431 - - -
Presence of preoperative HTN 1.446 1.135-1.842 0.002 1.492 1.167-1.908 0.001

HR: hazard ratio, CI: confidence interval, BMI: body mass index, GFR: glomerular filtration rate, DM: diabetes mellitus, HTN: hypertension.

Five-year OS rates were no significant difference in the HTN group and in the no-HTN group (89.3% vs, 90.5%, log-rank p=0.661), also no difference in low-BMI group and in the high-BMI group (86.6% vs, 93.2% log-rank p=0.143). Five-year CSS rates were no significant difference in the HTN group and in the no-HTN group (91.8% vs. 94.1%, log-rank p=0.802), also no difference in low-BMI group and in the high-BMI group (91.8% vs. 94.1% log-rank p=0.300) (Table 2). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that BMI and HTN are not significantly related to OS and CSS after adjusting for other factors (Tables 4, 5).
Table 4.
Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis predict significant factors to overall survival on after radical nephroureterctomy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients
Variable Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
HR 95% CI p-value HR 95% CI p-value
Age 1.085 1.046-1.126 <0.005 1.108 1.061-1.156 <0.005
BMI (<24 vs. ≥24 kg/m2) 0.467 0.251-0.868 0.016 0.102 0.314-1.111 0.102
History of smoking 0.651 0.257-1.652 0.367      
Adjuvant Chemotherapy 3.737 2.056-6.792 <0.005 3.916 1.868-8.210 <0.005
Tumor stage (≥T3 or not) 4.770 2.531-8.991 <0.005 2.148 1.025-4.498 0.043
Tumor grade (≥3 or not) 1.230 0.680-2.226 0.494 - - -
Lymph node invasion 1.214 0.676-2.181 0.515 - - -
Positive surgical margin 2.730 1.067-6.892 0.036 1.266 0.493-3.250 0.623
Postoperative GFR 1.008 0.993-1.023 0.286 - - -
Presence of preoperative Hydronephrosis 1.043 0.554-1.960 0.897 - - -
Presence of preoperative DM 1.664 0.656-4.223 0.283 - - -
Presence of preoperative HTN 1.309 0.728-2.354 0.368 - - -

HR: hazard ratio, CI: confidence interval, BMI: body mass index, GFR: glomerular filtration rate, DM: diabetes mellitus, HTN: hypertension.

Table 5.
Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis predict significant factors to cancer specific survival on after radical nephroureterctomy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients
Variable Univariate analysis
Multi-variate analysis
HR 95% CI p-value HR 95% CI p-value
Age 1.059 1.012-1.108 0.013 1.092 1.032-1.155 0.002
BMI (<24 vs. ≥24 kg/m2) 0.797 0.368-1.724 0.564 - - -
History of smoking 0.664 0.199-2.211 0.504 - - -
Adjuvant Chemotherapy 10.480 3.948-27.819 <0.005 8.632 2.840-26.237 <0.005
Tumor stage (≥T3 or not) 8.934 3.360-23.751 <0.005 2.850 0.978-8.302 0.055
Tumor grade (≥3 or not) 1.066 0.493-2.308 0.870 - - -
Lymph node invasion 1.282 0.594-2.766 0.527 - - -
Positive surgical margin 5.013 1.869-13.445 0.001 2.306 0.864-6.153 0.095
Postoperative GFR 1.006 0.987-1.026 0.548 - - -
Presence of preoperative Hydronephrosis 1.324 0.600-2.919 0.487 - - -
Presence of preoperative DM 1.637 0.491-5.454 0.422 - - -
Presence of preoperative HTN 1.844 0.835-4.069 0.130 - - -

HR: hazard ratio, CI: confidence interval, BMI: body mass index, GFR: glomerular filtration rate, DM: diabetes mellitus, HTN: hypertension.

Discussion

Although UTUC is not a common cancer, it has a high recurrence rate. In particular, smoking status, tumor stage, and lymph node metastases are associated with UTUC recurrence. This study assessed how obesity and HTN, which continue to increase in incidence, might be linked to UTUC. Thus, in 453 RNUx-operated UTUC patients, we found that RFS in patients with high-BMI, without HTN, was good. Several papers exist about the relationship between renal cell carcinoma and HTN and BMI, but few studies have been published about the relationship between UTUC and HTN and BMI.
In one study, when 236 UTUC patients underwent RNUx in China, higher BMI was associated with better RFS and CSS.18 In another paper, low-BMI was an independent pre-dictor of worse CSS on multivariate analysis in 103 obese patients (HR, 2.210; p=0.047).21 In patients with high-BMI, increased fat between the kidney and Gerota's fascia may suggest that the higher the BMI, the better will be survival, as UTUC has difficulty in transitioning and invading beyond the fascia.18 Furthermore, Obesity is associated with hyperinsulinemia, which may increase the secretion of pep-tide hormones such as leptin and adiponectin. These peptide hormones promote the proliferation and activation of natural killer cells, resulting in antitumor effects.22
Recently, a large-scale prospective study of 226,505 patients with UTUC reported that HTN was related to UTUC by using univariate analysis. HTN are components of meta-bolic syndrome, which is involved in cancer development. HTN affects apoptosis, which regulates cell turnover in oth-er solid cancers. HTN also has a metabolic pathway asso-ciated with oxidative stress, another cancer-causing factor.23
In this study, the patient with HTN and low-BMI showed higher recurrence rate than the patient with high-BMI and without HTN (67.6% vs. 47.4% p=0.013). Although, BMI and HTN is generally positively correlated, those factors can affect in a contradictory manner. A study showed that obese patients had lower mortality by cardiovascular and is-chemic heart disease than non-obese patients in hyper-tensive patients.24 Like this research, BMI and HTN can act as independent variables and even obesity showed pro-tective effects in some studies regarding UTUC patients. But it is difficult to clearly describe underlying pathophysi-ology of this contradictorily looking phenomenon. This is considered to be a limitation, and further investigation would be needed.
Our study has several limitations. First, as a retrospective study, each patient had a different follow-up period, and various biases were generated, such as inability to adjust the treatment method for UTUC. Second, BMI and HTN were assessed just before surgery, but all patients who underwent surgery were not being treated for HTN, so it was unclear how well HTN was being treated and controlled. Third, the effect of HTN and BMI on OS and CSS in UTUC patients was investigated, but there was no statistically significant difference in this study. Despite these limitations, our paper suggests that HTN and BMI tend to relapse in UTUC. Therefore, further prospective studies are needed to inves-tigate the relationship between HTN, BMI, and UTUC.

Conclusions

Among UTUC patients who underwent RNUx, HTN ver-sus no-HTN was associated with worse RFS. Further, low-BMI (<24 kg/m2) was associated with worse RFS than high-BMI. Future prospective studies are required to vali-date our results, and basic or translational research should be conducted to determine potential mechanisms for the re-lationships between HTN, BMI, and UTUC.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors claim no conflicts of interest.

References

1. Koo KC, Lee KS, Chung BH. Urologic cancers in Korea. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2015;45:805-11.
crossref pmid
2. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin 2016;66:7-30.
crossref pmid
3. Rouprêt M, Babjuk M, Compérat E, Zigeuner R, Sylvester RJ, Burger M, et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: 2017 update. Eur Urol 2018;73:111-22.
crossref pmid
4. Remzi M, Haitel A, Margulis V, Karakiewicz P, Montorsi F, Kikuchi E, et al. Tumour architecture is an independent predictor of outcomes after nephroureterectomy: a multi-institutional analysis of 1363 patients. BJU Int 2009;103:307-11.
crossref pmid
5. Rink M, Xylinas E, Margulis V, Cha EK, Ehdaie B, Raman JD, et al. Impact of smoking on oncologic outcomes of upper tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy. Eur Urol 2013;63:1082-90.
crossref pmid
6. Messer JC, Terrell JD, Herman MP, Ng CK, Scherr DS, Scoll B, et al. Multi-institutional validation of the ability of preoperative hydronephrosis to predict advanced pathologic tumor stage in upper-tract urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol 2013;31:904-8.
crossref pmid
7. Chung PH, Krabbe LM, Darwish OM, Westerman ME, Bagrodia A, Gayed BA, et al. Degree of hydronephrosis predicts adverse pathological features and worse oncologic outcomes in patients with high-grade urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract. Urol Oncol 2014;32:981-8.
crossref pmid
8. Oosterlinck W, Solsona E, van der Meijden AP, Sylvester R, Böhle A, Rintala E, et al. EAU guidelines on diagnosis and treatment of upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2004;46:147-54.
crossref pmid
9. Colin P, Koenig P, Ouzzane A, Berthon N, Villers A, Biserte J, et al. Environmental factors involved in carcinogenesis of urothelial cell carcinomas of the upper urinary tract. BJU Int 2009;104:1436-40.
crossref pmid
10. Martin RM, Vatten L, Gunnell D, Romundstad P, Nilsen TI. Components of the metabolic syndrome and risk of prostate cancer: the HUNT 2 cohort, Norway. Cancer Causes Control 2009;20:1181-92.
crossref pmid
11. Lindgren A, Pukkala E, Nissinen A, Tuomilehto J. Blood pressure, smoking, and the incidence of lung cancer in hypertensive men in North Karelia, Finland. Am J Epidemiol 2003;158:442-7.
crossref pmid
12. Freedland SJ, Sun L, Kane CJ, Presti JC Jr, Terris MK, Amling CL, et al. Obesity and oncological outcome after radical prostatectomy: impact of prostate-specific antigen-based prostate cancer screening: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital and Duke Prostate Center databases. BJU Int 2008;102:969-74.
crossref pmid
13. Kamat AM, Shock RP, Naya Y, Rosser CJ, Slaton JW, Pisters LL. Prognostic value of body mass index in patients undergoing nephrectomy for localized renal tumors. Urology 2004;63:46-50.
crossref pmid
14. Schips L, Lipsky K, Zigeuner R, Gidaro S, Salfellner M, Rehak P, et al. Does overweight impact on the prognosis of patients with renal cell carcinoma? A single center experience of 683 patients. J Surg Oncol 2004;88:57-61.
crossref pmid
15. Lee CT, Dunn RL, Chen BT, Joshi DP, Sheffield J, Montie JE. Impact of body mass index on radical cystectomy. J Urol 2004;172(4 Pt 1):1281-5.
crossref pmid
16. Hafron J, Mitra N, Dalbagni G, Bochner B, Herr H, Donat SM. Does body mass index affect survival of patients undergoing radical or partial cystectomy for bladder cancer? J Urol 2005;173:1513-7.
crossref pmid
17. Kok VC, Zhang HW, Lin CT, Huang SC, Wu MF. Positive association between hypertension and urinary bladder cancer: epidemiologic evidence involving 79,236 propensity score-matched individuals. Ups J Med Sci 2018;123:109-15.
crossref pmid pmc
18. Liu JY, Li YH, Liu ZW, Zhang ZL, Ye YL, Yao K, et al. Influence of body mass index on oncological outcomes in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma treated with radical nephroureterectomy. Int J Urol 2014;21:136-42.
crossref pmid
19. Wang Q, Zhang T, Wu J, Wen J, Tao D, Wan T, et al. Prognosis and risk factors of patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma and postoperative recurrence of bladder cancer in central China. BMC Urol 2019;19:24.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
20. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, Fritz AG, Balch CM, Haller DG, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual. 6th ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2002.
21. Inamoto T, Komura K, Watsuji T, Azuma H. Specific body mass index cut-off value in relation to survival of patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas. Int J Clin Oncol 2012;17:256-62.
crossref pmid
22. Calle EE, Kaaks R. Overweight, obesity and cancer: epidemiological evidence and proposed mechanisms. Nat Rev Cancer 2004;4:579-91.
crossref pmid
23. Chen JS, Lu CL, Huang LC, Shen CH, Chen SC. Chronic kidney disease is associated with upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a nationwide population-based cohort study in Taiwan. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95:e3255.
crossref pmid pmc
24. Barrett-Connor E, Khaw KT. Is hypertension more benign when associated with obesity? Circulation 1985;72:53-60.
crossref pmid


Editorial Office
Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine,
101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Korea
TEL: +82-2-2072-0817,   FAX: +82-2-742-4665   Email: journal@e-juo.org
Korean Urological Oncology Society
50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea
Tel: +82-2-704-8574, E-mail: kspe.editor@gmail.com

Copyright © The Korean Urological Oncology Society.

Developed in M2PI